|
|

Several 10-15,000 year old archaeological finds in Eastern
Europe and the Middle East of domestic dog-looking canids
indicate that the dog was the first domestic animal. Apart
from this, however, archaeological studies have not produced
any detailed facts about the origin of the domestic dog. The
most basic questions; the number of founding events, and where
and when these occurred, have remained unsolved. To address
these questions, we examined the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)
sequence variation among 654 domestic dogs representing all
major dog populations worldwide. We found that although our
data indicate several maternal origins from wolf, >95%
of all sequences belonged to three phylogenetic groups universally
represented at similar frequencies. This suggests a common
origin from a single gene pool for all dog populations. A
larger genetic variation (as measured by a number of parameters;
mean pairwise distance, number of haplotypes and unique haplotypes,
genetic distance of unique haplotypes to universal types,
proportion of sequences with unique haplotypes) in East Asia
than in other regions and the pattern of phylogeographic variation
suggest that the domestic dog originated in East Asia. While
a precise date for the first origin of the dog cannot be given
based on the mtDNA data, a synthesis of the mtDNA data and
evidence from the archaeological record suggests that a probable
time for the first origin of domestic dogs is ~15,000 years
ago.
Key (own) publications
|
1. |
Savolainen P, Zhang Y-P, Luo J, Lundeberg
J, Leitner T. Genetic evidence for an East Asian origin
of domestic dogs. Science 2002:298, 1610-1613. Abstract
and full article |
|